<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Cupid GoldFish</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cupidgoldfish.com/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cupidgoldfish.com/blog</link>
	<description>The Rumors were True</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 03:33:27 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Xrumer- Full Review- Fear it by Another Texen</title>
		<link>http://cupidgoldfish.com/blog/2009/12/xrumer-full-review-feer-it/comment-page-1/#comment-816</link>
		<dc:creator>Another Texen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 03:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cupidgoldfish.com/blog/xrumer-full-review-feer-it#comment-816</guid>
		<description>is this still possible? ...I really need traffic for my fishing blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is this still possible? &#8230;I really need traffic for my fishing blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google Chrome SEO PageRank by Michael G</title>
		<link>http://cupidgoldfish.com/blog/2010/05/google-chrome-seo-pagerank/comment-page-1/#comment-769</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 09:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cupidgoldfish.com/blog/google-chrome-seo-pagerank#comment-769</guid>
		<description>google chrome seo is a web browser yes, and NOW a great SEO tool. I knew about this before, but I am having a hard-time adapting after using firefox for so long. - You need to write a post about changing over from firefox to chrome- Like the howto&#039;s

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>google chrome seo is a web browser yes, and NOW a great SEO tool. I knew about this before, but I am having a hard-time adapting after using firefox for so long. &#8211; You need to write a post about changing over from firefox to chrome- Like the howto&#8217;s</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google Chrome SEO PageRank by RodFather</title>
		<link>http://cupidgoldfish.com/blog/2010/05/google-chrome-seo-pagerank/comment-page-1/#comment-770</link>
		<dc:creator>RodFather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 May 2010 18:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cupidgoldfish.com/blog/google-chrome-seo-pagerank#comment-770</guid>
		<description>Lets get one thing straight. Google chrome is a web browser. Google is a search engine just like yahoo, ninemsn etc and so forth. So, now they developed a tool for us webmaster? ..................;-) Good post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lets get one thing straight. Google chrome is a web browser. Google is a search engine just like yahoo, ninemsn etc and so forth. So, now they developed a tool for us webmaster? &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;;-) Good post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google Chrome SEO PageRank by Fish SEO Guru</title>
		<link>http://cupidgoldfish.com/blog/2010/05/google-chrome-seo-pagerank/comment-page-1/#comment-768</link>
		<dc:creator>Fish SEO Guru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 13:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cupidgoldfish.com/blog/google-chrome-seo-pagerank#comment-768</guid>
		<description>These two are great and its awesome to see people creating plug-ins for Google Chrome now instead of Firefox all the time. I also use a third Chrome SEO extension which you guys might want to check out, its called SEO Quake and can be&lt;a href=&quot;https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/akdgnmcogleenhbclghghlkkdndkjdjc&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; downloaded here...&lt;/a&gt;

Cool post CGF!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These two are great and its awesome to see people creating plug-ins for Google Chrome now instead of Firefox all the time. I also use a third Chrome SEO extension which you guys might want to check out, its called SEO Quake and can be<a target="_blank" href="https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/akdgnmcogleenhbclghghlkkdndkjdjc" rel="nofollow"> downloaded here&#8230;</a></p>
<p>Cool post CGF!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Twitter: Is it worth the time? by admin</title>
		<link>http://cupidgoldfish.com/blog/2010/01/twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-532</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 17:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cupidgoldfish.com/blog/twitter#comment-532</guid>
		<description>Hang tight bassblastr72 we are still working on it.. it&#039;s been almost 3 months in the making</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hang tight bassblastr72 we are still working on it.. it&#8217;s been almost 3 months in the making</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Twitter: Is it worth the time? by bassblastr72</title>
		<link>http://cupidgoldfish.com/blog/2010/01/twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-528</link>
		<dc:creator>bassblastr72</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 18:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cupidgoldfish.com/blog/twitter#comment-528</guid>
		<description>Where is the report? ...been over a month now..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where is the report? &#8230;been over a month now..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Xrumer- Full Review- Fear it by Golf Guidebook</title>
		<link>http://cupidgoldfish.com/blog/2009/12/xrumer-full-review-feer-it/comment-page-1/#comment-499</link>
		<dc:creator>Golf Guidebook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 12:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cupidgoldfish.com/blog/xrumer-full-review-feer-it#comment-499</guid>
		<description>I simply can&#039;t believe how many individuals place spam on websites, particularly personal blogs just for the sake of some link juice. I need to stay alert all day still with fancy plugins like Akismet. I don&#039;t want to imagine what would happen to my websites if I didn&#039;t had this kind of protection. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I simply can&#8217;t believe how many individuals place spam on websites, particularly personal blogs just for the sake of some link juice. I need to stay alert all day still with fancy plugins like Akismet. I don&#8217;t want to imagine what would happen to my websites if I didn&#8217;t had this kind of protection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What can Google&#8217;s Algorithms do for you? by Fish SEO Guru</title>
		<link>http://cupidgoldfish.com/blog/2010/03/what-can-googles-algorithms-do-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-483</link>
		<dc:creator>Fish SEO Guru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 11:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cupidgoldfish.com/blog/what-can-googles-algorithms-do-for-you#comment-483</guid>
		<description>Great post and I am finally happy to see another site that specializes in Hunting and fishing. Here are some more factors:
&lt;strong&gt;
13 factors you need for your site/domain&lt;/strong&gt;

1. Domain age;
2. Length of domain registration;
3. Domain registration information hidden/anonymous;
4. Site top level domain (geographical focus, e.g. com versus co.uk);
5. Site top level domain (e.g. .com versus .info);
6. Sub domain or root domain?
7. Domain past records (how often it changed IP);
8. Domain past owners (how often the owner was changed)
9. Keywords in the domain;
10. Domain IP;
11. Domain IP neighbors;
12. Domain external mentions (non-linked)
13. Geo-targeting settings in Google Webmaster Tools

Server-side: 2 factors

1. Server geographical location;
2. Server reliability / uptime

Architecture: 8 factors

1. URL structure;
2. HTML structure;
3. Semantic structure;
4. Use of external CSS / JS files;
5. Website structure accessibility (use of inaccessible navigation, JavaScript, etc);
6. Use of canonical URLs;
7. “Correct” HTML code (?);
8. Cookies usage;

Content: 14 factors

1. Content language
2. Content uniqueness;
3. Amount of content (text versus HTML);
4. Unlinked content density (links versus text);
5. Pure text content ratio (without links, images, code, etc)
6. Content topicality / timeliness (for seasonal searches for example);
7. Semantic information (phrase-based indexing and co-occurring phrase indicators)
8. Content flag for general category (transactional, informational, navigational)
9. Content / market niche
10. Flagged keywords usage (gambling, dating vocabulary)
11. Text in images (?)
12. Malicious content (possibly added by hackers);
13. Rampant mis-spelling of words, bad grammar, and 10,000 word screeds without punctuation;
14. Use of absolutely unique /new phrases.

Internal Cross Linking: 5 factors

1. # of internal links to page;
2. # of internal links to page with identical / targeted anchor text;
3. # of internal links to page from content (instead of navigation bar, breadcrumbs, etc);
4. # of links using “nofollow” attribute; (?)
5. Internal link density,

Website factors: 7 factors

1. Website Robots.txt file content
2. Overall site update frequency;
3. Overall site size (number of pages);
4. Age of the site since it was first discovered by Google
5. XML Sitemap;
6. On-page trust flags (Contact info ( for local search even more important), Privacy policy, TOS, and similar);
7. Website type (e.g. blog instead of informational sites in top 10)

Page-specific factors: 9 factors

1. Page meta Robots tags;
2. Page age;
3. Page freshness (Frequency of edits and
% of page effected (changed) by page edits);
4. Content duplication with other pages of the site (internal duplicate content);
5. Page content reading level; (?)
6. Page load time (many factors in here);
7. Page type (About-us page versus main content page);
8. Page internal popularity (how many internal links it has);
9. Page external popularity (how many external links it has relevant to other pages of this site);

Keywords usage and keyword prominence: 13 factors

1. Keywords in the title of a page;
2. Keywords in the beginning of page title;
3. Keywords in Alt tags;
4. Keywords in anchor text of internal links (internal anchor text);
5. Keywords in anchor text of outbound links (?);
6. Keywords in bold and italic text (?);
7. Keywords in the beginning of the body text;
8. Keywords in body text;
9. Keyword synonyms relating to theme of page/site;
10. Keywords in filenames;
11. Keywords in URL;
12. No “Randomness on purpose” (placing “keyword” in the domain, “keyword” in the filename, “keyword” starting the first word of the title, “keyword” in the first word of the first line of the description and keyword tag…)
13. The use (abuse) of keywords utilized in HTML comment tags

Outbound links: 8 factors

1. Number of outbound links (per domain);
2. Number of outbound links (per page);
3. Quality of pages the site links in;
4. Links to bad neighborhoods;
5. Relevancy of outbound links;
6. Links to 404 and other error pages.
7. Links to SEO agencies from clients site
8. Hot-linked images

Backlink profile: 21 factors

1. Relevancy of sites linking in;
2. Relevancy of pages linking in;
3. Quality of sites linking in;
4. Quality of web page linking in;
5. Backlinks within network of sites;
6. Co-citations (which sites have similar backlink sources);
7. Link profile diversity:
1. Anchor text diversity;
2. Different IP addresses of linking sites,
3. Geographical diversity,
4. Different TLDs,
5. Topical diversity,
6. Different types of linking sites (logs, directories, etc);
7. Diversity of link placements
8. Authority Link (CNN, BBC, etc) Per Inbound Link
9. Backlinks from bad neighborhoods (absence / presence of backlinks from flagged sites)
10. Reciprocal links ratio (relevant to the overall backlink profile);
11. Social media links ratio (links from social media sites versus overall backlink profile);
12. Backlinks trends and patterns (like sudden spikes or drops of backlink number)
13. Citations in Wikipedia and Dmoz;
14. Backlink profile historical records (ever caught for link buying/selling, etc);
15. Backlinks from social bookmarking sites.

Each Separate Backlink: 6 factors

1. Authority of TLD (.com versus .gov)
2. Authority of a domain linking in
3. Authority of a page linking in
4. Location of a link (footer, navigation, body text)
5. Anchor text of a link (and Alt tag of images linking)
6. Title attribute of a link (?)

Visitor Profile and Behavior: 6 factors

1. Number of visits;
2. Visitors’ demographics;
3. Bounce rate;
4. Visitors’ browsing habits (which other sites they tend to visit)
5. Visiting trends and patterns (like sudden spiked in incoming traffic)
6. How often the listing is clicked within the SERPs (relevant to other listings)

Penalties, Filters and Manipulation: 12 factors

1. Keyword over usage / Keyword stuffing;
2. Link buying flag
3. Link selling flag;
4. Spamming records (comment, forums, other link spam);
5. Cloaking;
6. Hidden Text;
7. Duplicate Content (external duplication)
8. History of past penalties for this domain
9. History of past penalties for this owner
10. History of past penalties for other properties of this owner (?)
11. Past hackers’ attacks records
12. 301 flags: double re-directs/re-direct loops, or re-directs ending in 404 error

More Factors (6):

1. Domain registration with Google Webmaster Tools;
2. Domain presence in Google News;
3. Domain presence in Google Blog Search;
4. Use of the domain in Google AdWords;
5. Use of the domain in Google Analytics;
6. Business name / brand name external mentions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post and I am finally happy to see another site that specializes in Hunting and fishing. Here are some more factors:<br />
<strong><br />
13 factors you need for your site/domain</strong></p>
<p>1. Domain age;<br />
2. Length of domain registration;<br />
3. Domain registration information hidden/anonymous;<br />
4. Site top level domain (geographical focus, e.g. com versus co.uk);<br />
5. Site top level domain (e.g. .com versus .info);<br />
6. Sub domain or root domain?<br />
7. Domain past records (how often it changed IP);<br />
8. Domain past owners (how often the owner was changed)<br />
9. Keywords in the domain;<br />
10. Domain IP;<br />
11. Domain IP neighbors;<br />
12. Domain external mentions (non-linked)<br />
13. Geo-targeting settings in Google Webmaster Tools</p>
<p>Server-side: 2 factors</p>
<p>1. Server geographical location;<br />
2. Server reliability / uptime</p>
<p>Architecture: 8 factors</p>
<p>1. URL structure;<br />
2. HTML structure;<br />
3. Semantic structure;<br />
4. Use of external CSS / JS files;<br />
5. Website structure accessibility (use of inaccessible navigation, JavaScript, etc);<br />
6. Use of canonical URLs;<br />
7. “Correct” HTML code (?);<br />
8. Cookies usage;</p>
<p>Content: 14 factors</p>
<p>1. Content language<br />
2. Content uniqueness;<br />
3. Amount of content (text versus HTML);<br />
4. Unlinked content density (links versus text);<br />
5. Pure text content ratio (without links, images, code, etc)<br />
6. Content topicality / timeliness (for seasonal searches for example);<br />
7. Semantic information (phrase-based indexing and co-occurring phrase indicators)<br />
8. Content flag for general category (transactional, informational, navigational)<br />
9. Content / market niche<br />
10. Flagged keywords usage (gambling, dating vocabulary)<br />
11. Text in images (?)<br />
12. Malicious content (possibly added by hackers);<br />
13. Rampant mis-spelling of words, bad grammar, and 10,000 word screeds without punctuation;<br />
14. Use of absolutely unique /new phrases.</p>
<p>Internal Cross Linking: 5 factors</p>
<p>1. # of internal links to page;<br />
2. # of internal links to page with identical / targeted anchor text;<br />
3. # of internal links to page from content (instead of navigation bar, breadcrumbs, etc);<br />
4. # of links using “nofollow” attribute; (?)<br />
5. Internal link density,</p>
<p>Website factors: 7 factors</p>
<p>1. Website Robots.txt file content<br />
2. Overall site update frequency;<br />
3. Overall site size (number of pages);<br />
4. Age of the site since it was first discovered by Google<br />
5. XML Sitemap;<br />
6. On-page trust flags (Contact info ( for local search even more important), Privacy policy, TOS, and similar);<br />
7. Website type (e.g. blog instead of informational sites in top 10)</p>
<p>Page-specific factors: 9 factors</p>
<p>1. Page meta Robots tags;<br />
2. Page age;<br />
3. Page freshness (Frequency of edits and<br />
% of page effected (changed) by page edits);<br />
4. Content duplication with other pages of the site (internal duplicate content);<br />
5. Page content reading level; (?)<br />
6. Page load time (many factors in here);<br />
7. Page type (About-us page versus main content page);<br />
8. Page internal popularity (how many internal links it has);<br />
9. Page external popularity (how many external links it has relevant to other pages of this site);</p>
<p>Keywords usage and keyword prominence: 13 factors</p>
<p>1. Keywords in the title of a page;<br />
2. Keywords in the beginning of page title;<br />
3. Keywords in Alt tags;<br />
4. Keywords in anchor text of internal links (internal anchor text);<br />
5. Keywords in anchor text of outbound links (?);<br />
6. Keywords in bold and italic text (?);<br />
7. Keywords in the beginning of the body text;<br />
8. Keywords in body text;<br />
9. Keyword synonyms relating to theme of page/site;<br />
10. Keywords in filenames;<br />
11. Keywords in URL;<br />
12. No “Randomness on purpose” (placing “keyword” in the domain, “keyword” in the filename, “keyword” starting the first word of the title, “keyword” in the first word of the first line of the description and keyword tag…)<br />
13. The use (abuse) of keywords utilized in HTML comment tags</p>
<p>Outbound links: 8 factors</p>
<p>1. Number of outbound links (per domain);<br />
2. Number of outbound links (per page);<br />
3. Quality of pages the site links in;<br />
4. Links to bad neighborhoods;<br />
5. Relevancy of outbound links;<br />
6. Links to 404 and other error pages.<br />
7. Links to SEO agencies from clients site<br />
8. Hot-linked images</p>
<p>Backlink profile: 21 factors</p>
<p>1. Relevancy of sites linking in;<br />
2. Relevancy of pages linking in;<br />
3. Quality of sites linking in;<br />
4. Quality of web page linking in;<br />
5. Backlinks within network of sites;<br />
6. Co-citations (which sites have similar backlink sources);<br />
7. Link profile diversity:<br />
1. Anchor text diversity;<br />
2. Different IP addresses of linking sites,<br />
3. Geographical diversity,<br />
4. Different TLDs,<br />
5. Topical diversity,<br />
6. Different types of linking sites (logs, directories, etc);<br />
7. Diversity of link placements<br />
8. Authority Link (CNN, BBC, etc) Per Inbound Link<br />
9. Backlinks from bad neighborhoods (absence / presence of backlinks from flagged sites)<br />
10. Reciprocal links ratio (relevant to the overall backlink profile);<br />
11. Social media links ratio (links from social media sites versus overall backlink profile);<br />
12. Backlinks trends and patterns (like sudden spikes or drops of backlink number)<br />
13. Citations in Wikipedia and Dmoz;<br />
14. Backlink profile historical records (ever caught for link buying/selling, etc);<br />
15. Backlinks from social bookmarking sites.</p>
<p>Each Separate Backlink: 6 factors</p>
<p>1. Authority of TLD (.com versus .gov)<br />
2. Authority of a domain linking in<br />
3. Authority of a page linking in<br />
4. Location of a link (footer, navigation, body text)<br />
5. Anchor text of a link (and Alt tag of images linking)<br />
6. Title attribute of a link (?)</p>
<p>Visitor Profile and Behavior: 6 factors</p>
<p>1. Number of visits;<br />
2. Visitors’ demographics;<br />
3. Bounce rate;<br />
4. Visitors’ browsing habits (which other sites they tend to visit)<br />
5. Visiting trends and patterns (like sudden spiked in incoming traffic)<br />
6. How often the listing is clicked within the SERPs (relevant to other listings)</p>
<p>Penalties, Filters and Manipulation: 12 factors</p>
<p>1. Keyword over usage / Keyword stuffing;<br />
2. Link buying flag<br />
3. Link selling flag;<br />
4. Spamming records (comment, forums, other link spam);<br />
5. Cloaking;<br />
6. Hidden Text;<br />
7. Duplicate Content (external duplication)<br />
8. History of past penalties for this domain<br />
9. History of past penalties for this owner<br />
10. History of past penalties for other properties of this owner (?)<br />
11. Past hackers’ attacks records<br />
12. 301 flags: double re-directs/re-direct loops, or re-directs ending in 404 error</p>
<p>More Factors (6):</p>
<p>1. Domain registration with Google Webmaster Tools;<br />
2. Domain presence in Google News;<br />
3. Domain presence in Google Blog Search;<br />
4. Use of the domain in Google AdWords;<br />
5. Use of the domain in Google Analytics;<br />
6. Business name / brand name external mentions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Xrumer- Full Review- Fear it by RodFather</title>
		<link>http://cupidgoldfish.com/blog/2009/12/xrumer-full-review-feer-it/comment-page-1/#comment-204</link>
		<dc:creator>RodFather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 11:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cupidgoldfish.com/blog/xrumer-full-review-feer-it#comment-204</guid>
		<description>I wanted to post and ask if you give strategy tips because I already own Xrumer. I&#039;ll barter a 12k list of PR-5 and PR-6 forums that allow sig links in the outdoor niche?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wanted to post and ask if you give strategy tips because I already own Xrumer. I&#8217;ll barter a 12k list of PR-5 and PR-6 forums that allow sig links in the outdoor niche?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Twitter: Is it worth the time? by admin</title>
		<link>http://cupidgoldfish.com/blog/2010/01/twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-194</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 06:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cupidgoldfish.com/blog/twitter#comment-194</guid>
		<description>No. In our test so far it&#039;s not even close with targeted Twitter nicks and traffic. Starting to look like a waste of time for direct traffic. BUT we have found/discovered a great way to climb the serps with a certain tool combined with a &quot;out of the box&quot; strategy. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No. In our test so far it&#8217;s not even close with targeted Twitter nicks and traffic. Starting to look like a waste of time for direct traffic. BUT we have found/discovered a great way to climb the serps with a certain tool combined with a &#8220;out of the box&#8221; strategy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
